Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathleen Christison
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Dakota 04:35, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
NN. Only real assertion of notability is from her book, which gets only 150 Ghits [1] [2], practically all of which are blogs. Aaron 02:18, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete She's written a book and some articles that have been picked up in leftist and Arab publications some of which are notable. If she were writing about just about any topic other than the Israeli-Palestinian conflict she would easily fail notability guidelines. She gets some pretty big google numbers but I think that has more to do with the topic she's writing about than what she has to say. However, if we adapt the academic notability test and consider all of the people who regularly write about this issue she is certainly not more notable than the average person writing about the topic. GabrielF 02:42, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non notable author, spook. Eusebeus 15:09, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. - Crockspot 16:34, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this is more of a 'Duh'-lete as it's pretty obvious. --Tbeatty 00:25, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Endless reserves of conspiracy cruft advocacy stuff out there I guess. Violates WP:BALLS, WP:SNOWBALL, and Wikipedia:Vanispamcruftisement. GiveMeAF___ingBreak! Morton devonshire 02:16, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete--Peephole 02:58, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, not notable to warrant article. --NuclearZer0 12:33, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete notability not established.--Jersey Devil 04:32, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Are you kidding? There were very few (less than 200) CIA case officers worldwide during her tenure. That alone makes her story notable. Her political position is not what makes her notable.--Blainster 21:27, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Change to Neutral Oops, found out the Christisons were analysts, of which there are many, not case officers. --Blainster 21:37, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.